Comments For: When It Comes To Hunting Ghosts Experience & Training Is Irrelevant... For The Most Part
When it comes to hunting ghosts, experience and training doesn't necessarily guarantee better evidence than that obtained by untrained members of the public.
More Like This
Ghost HuntingJanuary 26, 2025
These Are The Ghost Hunting Gadgets You Should Avoid If You Want To Be Taken Seriously As An Investigator
GamesDecember 09, 2024
Poltergeist Quiz
GamesDecember 08, 2024
Ouija Board Trivia Challenge
GamesDecember 04, 2024
Fakes, Hoaxes & Debunked Paranormal Claims Quiz
See More on Audible
Want To Join The Conversation?
Sign in or create an account to leave a comment.
Sign In
Create Account
Account Settings
WISPR-Investigations
Who writes this nonsense? Proper investigators don't look for ghosts, and they don't try to photograph ghosts either. We listen to the witness accounts, try to observe the alleged phenomena and possibly capture it on cameras and/or audio recorders. And then, using scientific methodology we try to find a cause for the reported event. Whether the findings are immediately obvious or if it takes multiple different hypotheses to answer the question. The problem real investigators have is dealing with the hordes of wannabee paranormal tv spiritualist teams who think every little occurence is paranormal.
May 10, 2025 16:10
The vast majority of people on investigations are indeed looking for ghosts - that's part of the problem. But even those who take a more methodical approach - as you rightly suggest they should - still don't deliver any results. The field of... The vast majority of people on investigations are indeed looking for ghosts - that's part of the problem. But even those who take a more methodical approach - as you rightly suggest they should - still don't deliver any results. The field of paranormal research is at least a century old and has hardly moved forward since the days of Harry Price. read more